Framework is building the platform for sustainable computingβ€”capturing a structural shift from disposable to modular electronics in a $200B+ laptop market

Key Metrics Snapshot

1.72M
Monthly Visits
54%
Direct Traffic
4.95
Pages/Visit
3:06
Session Duration
30%
Bounce Rate
+1,038%
AMD Referrals MoM

Geographic Traction

US 28.3%
India 5.4%
Germany 5.1%
Canada 4.0%

The Convergence: Why Now?

πŸ“œ
Right-to-Repair Legislation

Legislative momentum opening institutional procurement

🌱
ESG Mandates

Organizations reporting carbon footprint and e-waste

πŸ’Ό
Enterprise TCO Focus

IT departments extending refresh cycles

πŸ”§
Hardware Commoditization

Differentiation shifts to system architecture

πŸ‘₯
Community Adoption

Vocal early adopters validating demand

Demand is being pulled by buyers, not pushed by technology
1

The Incumbent Trap & Framework's Wedge

Why Incumbents Can't Compete

Revenue Model Conflict

Longer lifecycles cannibalize replacement sales

$50B+ at risk

Design Inertia

Sealed-unit supply chains can't pivot to true modularity

Closed Ecosystems

No incentive to enable third-party innovation

Framework's Differentiation

Framework Apple/Dell/HP ThinkPad DIY Builders
True Modularity βœ“ All components user-replaceable βœ— Sealed design ~ Some serviceability βœ“ Yes, but fragmented
Port Flexibility βœ“ Expansion Cards βœ— Fixed I/O βœ— Fixed I/O ~ Limited
Open Ecosystem βœ“ Open CAD, 3rd party βœ— Locked βœ— Vendor-locked βœ— No standardization
Upgrade Path βœ“ Multi-generational βœ— Buy new device ~ Limited βœ— No cohesive platform
Creating new category with platform-like network effects cannot replicate
2

Primary Markets

5-10% capture goal in 5-7 years
1

Prosumers/Developers

Value upgradeability, early adopters validating demand

2

Education/Public Sector

Sustainability mandates, procurement cycle alignment

3

Enterprise IT

Lower TCO, extended refresh cycles, simplified fleet management

Key Ecosystem Signals

πŸ’» Outbound GitHub traffic +68% MoM (developer engagement with open CAD files)
πŸ“± Social traffic led by YouTube, Reddit, Discord (technical communities)
🀝 Top referrals from tech media + AMD.com (component partner alignment)

Business Model Evolution

Today

Direct Laptop Sales

Primary revenue stream

β†’
Tomorrow

Recurring Streams

High-margin upgrades, parts, services

β†’
Platform Play

Ecosystem Lock-in

Third-party Expansion Cards create network effects

Revenue Stream Breakdown

Hardware Sales Base margin
Upgrade Parts Higher margin
Services (Future) Highest margin
3rd Party Ecosystem Platform fees
3
Why This Team Wins Where Hardware Startups Fail
This is the only team that can execute complex modular architecture at scale while building authentic community moat
4

Risks & Strategic Conflict

Key Investment Risks

High Likelihood, High Impact

1. Operational Execution

  • Parts shortages, quality control, support scaling
  • Evidence: Recent tariff-driven sales halt, community feedback on bugs/support
Mitigation: Supply chain diversification, support infrastructure investment
Medium Likelihood, Critical Impact

2. Crossing the Chasm

  • Must evolve from tech enthusiast product to mainstream/enterprise
  • Current marketing (internals focus) alienates "simplicity" buyers
Mitigation: Message evolution, enterprise pilot programs, sleek design emphasis
Structural Challenge

3. Capital Intensity

  • Building parallel ecosystem alone vs. entrenched competitors
  • Vulnerable to component price shocks (50% DDR5 increase example)
Mitigation: Recurring revenue model, component partner relationships
External, Acute

4. Taiwan Concentration

  • Manufacturing + supplier geopolitical/trade policy exposure

Direct Competitive Conflict with HP

Framework's success directly cannibalizes HP's sealed-unit replacement revenue model
HP's Response: "Modular" EliteBook = defensive, not open ecosystem
Business Model Clash: HP relies on high-volume, sealed-unit hardware cycles with planned refresh driving recurring sales
Framework's Threat: Modular, long-lifecycle laptops reduce purchase frequency across enterprise and consumer segments

Committee Question:

Is this a portfolio hedge on sustainable computing's inevitability?

Potential HP Acquisition Scenarios:

Positive: "Tuck-in" acquisition for sustainability credibility
Negative: Defensive "kill box" move to neutralize disruption
Strategic Implication: An investment in Framework is an implicit bet against the viability of HP's traditional sealed-product strategy
5

Investment Recommendation & Exit Paths

Why Invest

πŸ“ˆ

Structural Market Shift

Regulatory tailwinds actively pulling demand

🏰

Platform Moats

Emerging through standardized interfaces + open ecosystem

πŸ‘₯

Exceptional Team

Founder-market-operations fit de-risks hardware execution

πŸ’°

Capital Efficiency

Demonstrates PMF without heavy burn

Exit Scenarios

Strategic Acquisition

Most Likely, Favorable

Acquirer: Dell/Lenovo/component partner

Value: Platform + brand for sustainability positioning

Timeline: 3-5 years

Standalone IPO

High-Risk, Highest Upside

Requirement: Flawless execution to profitable scale

Value: Premium valuation as category leader

Timeline: 7+ years

Profitable Niche

Acceptable

Outcome: Sustainable private company

Value: Modest returns, mission alignment

Timeline: Ongoing

HP Acquisition

Complex

Risk: Sustainability "tuck-in" vs. defensive "kill box"

Value: Uncertain - mission outcome unclear

Timeline: 2-4 years if defensive

The Bet

Sustainable, repairable computing is inevitable. Framework has a 3-5 year head start with authentic community alignment that incumbents cannot buy or copy. We're investing in the platform that decouples upgrades from obsolescence.

Investment Ask
Amount: $5–10M
Valuation: $300–400M
Ownership: 1.5–3.0%
6